Skip to content

Free, no obligation consultation

Looking for No Win No Fee Solicitors in Royston?

Quickly check whether your Royston enquiry may fit a no win no fee claim with one short form.

Get Started with a FREE Consultation

Takes about a minute to start.

First4Lawyers are an award-winning claims management company. Their No Win No Fee lawyers will take a success fee from compensation awarded in winning cases – this is typically 25% but could be more depending on your circumstances.

The Basics

If you are looking for no win no fee solicitors in Royston, the key point is that this type of funding may be available for some personal injury and medical negligence claims, but it is not automatic and not every local firm will offer it. A no win no fee agreement usually means the solicitor is paid a success fee only if the claim succeeds, with the percentage, deductions, insurance position, and any case expenses set out in the paperwork. To check whether a Royston enquiry may fit this type of funding, get a free consultation with First4Lawyers, who can connect you with a solicitor offering no win no fee arrangements where appropriate.

People often search for Royston no win no fee solicitors because they are trying to understand the practical risks before starting anything: whether there are upfront legal costs, what might be deducted from compensation, and what happens if a claim does not succeed. Those are sensible questions to ask early. The important things to check are what the agreement covers, what percentage or success fee may apply, whether insurance or disbursements are mentioned, and which costs could still fall outside the arrangement.

Conditional Fee Agreements

No Win No Fee is a term in the UK commonly used to describe Conditional Fee Agreements (CFA) between lawyers and their clients. In general, a CFA lets a solicitor handle a claim without charging their standard fees upfront, with payment usually linked to a successful outcome. If the claim succeeds, the agreement may allow a success fee, which is commonly deducted from certain parts of compensation in many personal injury claims. If the claim is unsuccessful, the client may not have to pay the solicitor’s basic charges, but disbursements, opponent costs, or insurance terms can still matter depending on the agreement. For this reason, clients may be offered “After the Event” (ATE) insurance to help manage some of the risk of losing. The insurance premium and disbursements should be explained clearly before any agreement is signed. Not all types of cases allow no win no fee arrangements. Family and criminal cases do not allow CFAs to be used.

Types of Cost Components 

There are several cost components to be aware of when comparing the benefits, limits, and possible disadvantages of a No Win No Fee Agreement. The wording can vary between solicitors, so Royston readers should look at both the headline promise and the detail of what may be deducted, covered by insurance, or treated as a separate expense:

  • Basic Charges or Standard Fee – Fees associated with legal work done on behalf of a client.  Typically based on the number of hours spent and hourly rates associated with the staff involved with case. Different lawyers in Royston will have different fees for their day-to-day work, and these can vary between practices, and between qualified solicitors within a practice.
  • Disbursements – Payment for expenses made on behalf of the client including but not limited to court fees, experts’ fees, accident report fees and travelling expenses.
  • Success Fee or “Uplift” To compensate for the cost of lost cases, lawyers typically are allowed to add a success fee or ”Uplift” in the CFA.   This is usually a percentage (not more than 100%) of a lawyer’s basic charges that is added to a client’s bill for which they will seek to recover from the other party if they win the claim.
  • After the Event (“ATE”) Insurance Premium – Cost of Insurance as part of a no win no fee agreement to indemnify the costs and disbursements of the lawsuit.  Usually purchased at or after the start of the litigation process.

Advantages and Disadvantages

Advantages

  • Because the cost to the client is linked to the outcome of the case.  For an unsuccessful case, there is the possibility that the client pays little or no cost.
  • Required disclosure of a CFA to the other party may encourage earlier settlement as the other party’s cost will increase in line with the level of the success fee.
  • Any damages awarded to the client will not be eaten up by the success fee, as the success fee will in most cases be payable by the opponent.

Disadvantages

  • There is no privilege, nor privacy attached to the funding arrangement in place. The existence of the CFA must be disclosed to the other party at the outset of the litigation and the risk assessment has to be disclosed to the court and if necessary to the other party when costs are assessed.
  • A CFA gives the lawyer a financial interest in the litigation and because of this they are inclined to take control of the strategy and resolution of the litigation.
  • Unless the client buys ATE to cover the winning party’s costs, the client is still at risk to pay those costs.

To search for a specific Royston solicitor, try the Solicitors Regulation Authority website, which lists all the law firms and people regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority. Alternatively, visit our partner First4Lawyers for a free no-obligation chat about whether a no win no fee solicitor may be available for your enquiry and what questions to ask about costs before agreeing to anything.